National Merit Semifinalist Cutoffs Class of 2028

**Updated with information from released October 2026 PSAT scores as of November 6.**

If you’d like, jump right to the Compass Projections and State Explorer and then come back for the commentary.

The junior-year PSAT is also the National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (NMSQT). Each year, National Merit recognizes the top 55,000 test takers. To be included in that group, students must be among the top 4% of the 1.3 million eligible students who take the PSAT. Of that elite group, approximately 16,500 are recognized as Semifinalists for having the highest scores within their states. Semifinalists have the opportunity to continue in the program to become Finalists and, potentially, scholarship recipients. Some colleges provide significant scholarships and even full rides for Finalists. The remaining 39,000 students are recognized as Commended Students. More information can be found in our National Merit Explained post. If you are looking for Compass’s archived report on the class of 2027 results, find it here.

Calculating the Selection Index
National Merit uses the Selection Index (SI), found on the PSAT score report, to rank students. The Selection Index is calculated by doubling the Reading & Writing score (RW), adding the Math score (M), and dividing that sum by 10. For example, a student with a 720 RW score and a 700 M score has a Selection Index of 214: (720 x 2 + 700) Ă· 10. A student with a 700 RW and 720 M has a Selection Index of 212. The highest SI a student can receive is 228 (760 RW and 760 M). The weighting of the index means that not all students with the same Total Score have the same SI. “Will a 1450 qualify?” is not the right question. Instead, ask whether a student with a 750 RW and 700 M will qualify.

How Semifinalist cutoffs are set in each state
NMSC allocates a target number of Semifinalists to states based on their population of high school graduates, not all of whom take the PSAT. If Texas is allocated 1,500 Semifinalists based on its population of high school graduates, then NMSC works down from a perfect 228 Selection Index until it gets as close as possible to that target. In the class of 2027, 1,462 students scored at or above the cutoff of 219. A cutoff of 220 would have produced too few Semifinalists. A cutoff of 218 would have gone over the allocation. As scores go lower, more and more students occupy each level, and where the crowd forms does not stay consistent from year to year. It is easy for cutoffs to move up or down a point even when there is minimal change in testing behavior or performance. All students at or above a cutoff qualify.

Predicting scores for the class of 2028
The journey to National Merit is a long one. Semifinalists aren’t notified until September 2027, and Finalists might not hear until February 2028. Compass’s research aims to fill in some of the gaps during the long wait.

Approximately 80% of scores have been released by the first week in November. College Board only summarizes PSAT scores in broad ranges. The top range of 1400 to 1520 has proved to be an excellent indicator of the Commended cutoff and the overall trend in Semifinalist cutoffs.

Based on the scores released to date, Compass expects between 52,000 and 60,000 students to score in the top range, with 55,000 as the most likely figure. That’s only modestly above the 52,300 in the class of 2027, which is why Compass projects this year’s most likely Commended figure to be 209. Compass’s model assumes, based on prior years, that later scores will skew lower than earlier scores. However, we don’t yet know how many scores will be released in the final score release wave. We retain the possible Commended range of 207 – 211 to allow for uncertainty.

Comparing RW and Math scores also suggests moderation this year
Students considering their odds of qualifying as National Merit Semifinalists often look in horror at the class of 2026 cutoffs, which were among the highest recorded since the revised PSAT was introduced for the class of 2017. Compass has shown that those high cutoffs can likely be attributed to poor scaling of the RW section on the 2024 PSAT. Because RW receives double weight in the Selection Index, the scaling problem had an outsized impact on cutoffs, with New Jersey’s reaching 225. The good news is that this year’s results look more like those from the classes of 2025 and 2027 than they do those from the class of 2026. There are more high Math scores than RW scores (about a 1.33 to 1 ratio), which should keep the highest cutoffs in check. On average, Semifinalist cutoffs may see some upward movement, but there is no evidence of a spike.

Below is a chart of RW, Math, and Total scores over the 3 prior years, with estimates for the class of 2028. Final numbers should be available by November 13.

Did I make it?
A student’s natural instinct is to look at the prior year’s cutoff and ask, “Did I make it?” The historical record shows the shortcomings of that strategy. From the class of 2011 to the class of 2027, there has never been a year in which even half of the state cutoffs remained unchanged. Even with the added insight of national results, students should consider the likely range of cutoffs rather than focusing on a single score.

Semifinalist trends over time
In October 2015, the PSAT moved to a 320–1520 scale, which was set to provide vertical alignment with the SAT’s 400–1600 scale. The class of 2017 was the first group of students taking the redesigned PSAT/NMSQT, so the fairest comparisons are among the last eleven graduating classes.

Note how the Commended cutoff and state averages tend to track one another in the chart above. The chart below shows that there is more volatility in individual states, and more volatility in smaller states, but few states move against a rise or fall in the Commended level. We cannot assume, however, that the magnitude of the change will always be the same. We have an estimate of the Commended cutoff — a suspected 1-point increase — but won’t have confirmation until April.

Projections for the class of 2028: Consider the ranges.
In addition to our 50-state cutoff projections, Compass provides a deep dive into each state. Enter your own Selection Index or section scores to see how you stack up historically. The estimates consider state size, prior cutoffs and volatility, and Commended values.

As of 11/6/26, forecasted ranges combine historical data with early PSAT score information. The Commended cutoff will be confirmed in April.

Class of 2028 estimates by state

StateClass of 2028 estimatePast cutoffs
Most likelyEstimated range202720262025
Alabama212210–214210214212
Alaska211209–214208215214
Arizona216214–218215218217
Arkansas212210–214210215213
California221220–223220224221
Colorado217216–219217219218
Connecticut221219–222220223221
Delaware219216–221219220219
District of Columbia223222–224223225223
Florida217215–218216219217
Georgia218216–219217220218
Hawaii217215–219218219217
Idaho213210–215211215213
Illinois219218–221218222220
Indiana216214–218215218217
Iowa211209–213210214212
Kansas214212–216212216215
Kentucky212210–214211214213
Louisiana213211–215211216214
Maine214212–217214217214
Maryland222220–223221224222
Massachusetts222221–224221225223
Michigan217216–219216220218
Minnesota216214–218214219217
Mississippi211209–213211213212
Missouri215213–217214217215
Montana209208–212208213209
Nebraska212210–214212214211
Nevada212210–214211214214
New Hampshire216214–218215219217
New Jersey223222–224223225223
New Mexico209208–211209210211
New York220219–222220223220
North Carolina218216–219217220218
North Dakota209207–211208210210
Ohio217215–218216219217
Oklahoma210208–212210212211
Oregon217215–219216219216
Pennsylvania219217–220219221219
Rhode Island216213–218213219217
South Carolina213211–215212215214
South Dakota210208–212210211208
Tennessee216214–218214219217
Texas219218–221219222219
Utah211209–213209213211
Vermont213210–216212216215
Virginia221220–223221224222
Washington221220–223221224222
West Virginia209207–211208210209
Wisconsin213211–215212215214
Wyoming209207–211208210209
U.S. Students Abroad223222–224223225223
U.S. Territories209207–211208210208
Commended (national)209207–211208210208

Below are three of the most popular (and controversial) questions I get asked about the National Merit Scholarship Program. A couple of less controversial questions follow. Additional information can be found in our National Merit FAQ.

Why does each state have its own Semifinalist cutoff if the program is NATIONAL Merit?
This is always a hot-button question. NMSC allocates the approximately 16,500 Semifinalists among states based on the number of high school graduates. That way, students across the nation are represented. It also means that there are very different qualifying standards from state to state. A Massachusetts student with a 220 might miss out on being a Semifinalist. If she lived just 10 miles away in New Hampshire, she would qualify.

No Semifinalist cutoff can be lower than the national Commended level. Cutoffs for the District of Columbia and for U.S. students studying abroad are set at the highest state cutoff (typically New Jersey). The cutoff for students in U.S. territories and possessions falls at the Commended level each year. Boarding schools are grouped by region. The cutoff for a given region is the highest state cutoff within the region.

NMSC feels that the allocation method is the best way of ensuring truly national representation. That’s important, because without national representation, the program would likely not exist. National Merit requires participation from corporations and universities across the country. It constantly works to foster investment. Looking at the sponsors from 35 years ago, for example, shows just how much things change. The pitch to sponsors would be more difficult if Semifinalists were clustered in a smaller footprint. That doesn’t make the frustration any less real for the students who miss out.

When are National Merit Semifinalists announced? Why does it take so long?
The lists of Semifinalists will not be distributed to high schools until the end of August 2027. With the exception of homeschoolers, students do not receive direct notification. NMSC asks that schools not share the results publicly until the end of the press embargo in mid-September, but schools are allowed to notify students privately before that date. NMSC does not send Commended Student letters to high schools until mid-September. Compass will keep students updated on developments as the dates approach.

NMSC is an organization that values consistency — maybe sometimes to excess. The Semifinalist, Finalist, and Scholar cycle is little changed from what it was 60 years ago. Originally the NMSQT was in the spring of junior year, and email and the internet didn’t exist. Once the PSAT and NMSQT merged into a single exam, testing moved to the fall of junior year. The notification calendar never changed. During the winter and spring, NMSC is busy working with Finalist and Scholar selections. And counselors are busy getting seniors into college! In April and May, schools need to sign off on student eligibility. NMSC has always worked through schools for Semifinalist notifications, so September provides the next logical window. It’s slow and secretive, but it eventually works.

The schedule is hardest on students hoping to get one of the large scholarships offered by a limited number of universities. Key planning gets put on hold. I’d also like to see NMSC modernize its notification process. In the age of Bluebook, there is no excuse not to notify students directly and avoid the uncomfortable rollout of information. Colleges have long learned how to operate this way and build enthusiasm. The days of National Merit students being written up by the local newspaper are long gone, so why not let Instagram and TikTok take over?

Why is RW given twice the weight of Math?
There are many wrong answers to this question floating around the internet. It’s not because the PSAT had separate Reading and Writing sections during the SAT’s 2400 period. The weighting existed decades before that version of the exam. It’s not to favor one demographic over another. It dates back to the very creation of the test. In fact, the current method is more balanced than the original!

The National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (just the SQT in 1956 and 1957) was originally a separate test offered in the spring of junior year. The test was developed from the Iowa Testing Programs that also gave birth to the ACT. In fact, the NMSQT looked a lot like the original ACT. It had sections for English, Mathematics, Social Studies (Reading), Natural Sciences (Reading), and Vocabulary. Each section was scored 1-36, and the Selection Index was the sum of the five section scores. So 80% of the original Selection Index came from sections testing verbal skills. In 1971, NMSC merged the NMSQT with the College Entrance Examination Board’s PSAT, written by ETS. The PSAT and SAT only had Verbal and Mathematics scores (20-80 on the PSAT and 200-800 on the SAT). In order to keep a similar balance to the original NMSQT, the Verbal score was doubled to form the Selection Index.

The decision remains controversial, but its roots are 70 years old. As mentioned previously, NMSC likes continuity.

Do state and national percentiles indicate whether a student will be a National Merit Semifinalist?
No! Approximately 1% of test takers qualify as Semifinalists each year, so it is tempting to view a 99th percentile score as indicating a high enough score — especially now that College Board provides students with percentiles by state. There are several flaws in using percentiles as a quick way of determining National Merit status.

  • Percentiles are based on section scores or total score, not Selection Index
  • Percentiles are rounded. There is a large difference, from a National Merit perspective, between the top 0.51% and the top 1.49%
  • Percentiles reveal the percentage of students at or below a certain score, but the “at” part is important when NMSC is determining cutoffs.
  • The number of Semifinalists is based on the number of high school graduates in a state, not the number of PSAT takers. Percentiles are based on PSAT takers. States have widely varying participation rates.
  • Most definitive of all: Percentiles do not reflect the current year’s scores! They are based on the prior 3 years’ performance. They are set even before the test is given. And if you are going to use prior history, why not use the record of prior National Merit cutoffs rather than the highly suspect percentiles?

When my score report says “Eligible for National Merit,” does that mean I qualify?
Eligibility means entering the program; qualifying comes later. Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.3 million students from the 1.4 million PSAT takers enter the competition each year. Only about 55,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.

Share this post with friends:

Art Sawyer

Art graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University, where he was the top-ranked liberal arts student in his class. Art pioneered the one-on-one approach to test prep in California in 1989 and co-founded Compass Education Group in 2004 in order to bring the best ideas and tutors into students' homes and computers. Although he has attained perfect scores on all flavors of the SAT and ACT, he is routinely beaten in backgammon.

5,514 Comments

  • Samir says:

    I got a 208 on the latest PSAT (for class of 2026) and a 1400 overall. I was wondering whether that was a good or bad score.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Samir,
      It’s certainly a good score! Only about 4% of students do that well. It may fall just short this year, though, of qualifying for National Merit honors.

  • LA says:

    What are the chances that 217 makes the cutoff for Michigan? Thank you.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      LA,
      A lot of Michiganders in the comments today! It looks like things are shaping up to be very competitive this year. A 217 has qualified in 4 of the 9 years of the current PSAT incarnation. Unfortunately, the years in which we have seen the strongest scores nationally also saw Michigan’s cutoff at 219. Things can still go your way, but I don’t want to mislead you. Maybe a 20% chance.

  • Tanish says:

    What do you think is the chance I will get NMSF with a 219 in Illinois? Thanks.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Tanish,
      If I am candid, it is going to take a bit of good fortune. Scores nationally seem to be on an upward trend, so I think it’s more likely than not that Illinois’ cutoff will be at 220 or 221. But we don’t really know how the students of Illinois did, so you are still in the running. 20-25% would be the chances I’d estimate.

  • Deepa says:

    my daughter got a 218 . We live in Florida. Do you think the score is enough for her being a semifinalist for 2025? Also should she be doign anything now?
    Your thoughts. Thank you

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Deepa,
      I think it is likely that Florida’s cutoff will move up from last year’s 217. The question then becomes whether it goes to 218 or 219. I still think 218 is a bit more likely.

      The good news is that she doesn’t need to do anything beyond what she is likely already doing. Semifinalist is based just on her score, so that’s a waiting game. The Finalist stage also accounts for grades and school recommendation (and your daughter’s essay). So good grades and stay out of trouble! Sounds like what every parent would like to see.

      • Liz says:

        I was going to ask about a 218 in Florida as well. My oldest son is a NMSF this year (class of 2025) with a 219 index score (1460 total). My younger son (class of 2026) has a 218 (1470 total) so it’s going to be a long 10 months of waiting to hear officially, with a little extra brotherly competition thrown in 🤣🤦‍♀️. Your blog is such a great resource, thank you for all your efforts!

  • JMAC says:

    Jumping in here, but first would like to thank you for this excellent and informative page. My son got a 220 for NY. You predict that NY will remain at 220, which would be fantastic, but could you explain why it is you believe it will not change upward for the Class of 2026? (I saw elsewhere that NY has hovered at 220 for the past 5 years, only one of those years dipping to 219…but for the three years prior to that (2018-2020), it was at 221.) I am just trying to interpret these trends (and possibly understand the three-year blip at 221) and see if we can hold onto the idea that it is at least “LIKELY” he will make it when SF statuses are released next fall. Many thanks for your assistance. Looking forward to checking back here next week when the last batch drops.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      JMAC,
      I gave a lot of thought to that one, since we can say with a high degree of confidence that New York will come in at 219, 220, or 221. The reason I decided to stick with a 220 “most likely” is that we still don’t know what the last set of scores will show. In those years where we saw a 221 for NY, the national figures for 1400-1520 scorers ranged from 65K to 71K. We are currently at 58,000. That’s already well more than last year, so why didn’t I bump the most likely to 221? Because that’s still less than 65,000. In the paper-test era, those high years usually reflected form codes that skewed high in terms of results. As much as College Board tries to keep every test aligned, it doesn’t always succeed. When the cause of high scores is misalignment, that is usually going to flow through to many states. Ultimately, we want know how New York students did until next fall. Are the odds of 220 vs 221 40/60, 50/50, 60/40? I’ll probably tip my estimate one way or another next week, but it will still just be an estimate. Alas, September is a long way away.

      • JMAC says:

        Thank you for your reply. Am I correct, though, that you would need to see increases in the numbers of students scoring at the 1480+ level (correlating to 220+) to see upward movement of the index? Because students in the low 1400s would not put any upward pressure on it, I wouldn’t think. (I am asking this without any knowledge of how the data are collected.) Either way, I will definitely come back here next week. Thanks again!

        • Art Sawyer says:

          You’re right. If only College Board would provide those scores! So the best we can do is assume that the distribution of all scores within the 1400-1520 range have shifted upward. In other words, more 210s, more 215s, more 220s. Historically, that has proved true, but if it were a perfect correlation, the world would be so much easier.

          • JMAC says:

            Hello again, Art: Was very interested to see what changed after the last score drop – if anything. Still focusing on NY and it looks like you still have it “likely” at a 220. In our earlier conversation, you mentioned you’d tip your estimate after this last score data drop in terms of how likely is your “likely.” I did read through some of your recent comments and noted you stated that (1) the data showed fewer top scores in the last score dump; and (2) the largest percent of scores in the 1400-1520 band are at the 1400-1440 level (and that there are fewer at the 1480+ level). My son got a 1480 (720/760) with a SI of 220. Do you feel comfortable giving a confidence level to your NY “likely 220” prediction now that all the data are in? Many thanks!!

          • Art Sawyer says:

            JMAC,
            I may have to go back and check my wording on the 1400-1440 comment, because you are the second person that interpreted it in a different way than I meant it. Apologies. That was referencing the general distribution of scores. There will always be more modestly high scores than extremely high scores. College Board does not provide those break downs year-to-year, so I didn’t mean to imply a particular change for *this* year. I still don’t think we can rule out a 221, but I like the chances of a 220 in NY. 80%-ish.

  • Laura says:

    What are the normal trends you see in the third wave of score releases? Do they follow a trend? What are you thinking we will get up to for high score # total? If we are already at 57k!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Laura,
      The multi-date return only started last year (and it was in halves). The second half had fewer high scores, but it will be interesting to see what the last wave has in store this time. It’s going to be the smallest batch. If we guess that there are another 200,000 scores coming and that they come in at about 3.5% in the top range, then we’d be looking at around 65K total in the 1400-1520 range. I’m quite curious.

  • Tim says:

    My junior son just got his scores and was thrilled with his 227. He expected to to well, but not that well. Based on your site, he is a guaranteed Semi-Finalist. But does the SAT confirmation for Finalist status need to match or exceed his PSAT score, or does it just need to correlate to the state minimum for a semi-finalist? We live in the highest PSAT scoring state (224 historically based on your chart), so the bar is already high. Just wanted to understand how well he needs to do on the SAT to be a lock as a Finalist (all of the other criteria being met) and if that too has a different bar for each state. He will be applying early decision to a score blind university, so we would like him to take his confirmation SAT well before the Semi-finalist notification date.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Congratulations! The great news is that the confirming score is set nationally — usually at the year’s Commended level. So even if we saw the Commended level rise to 212, your son should have no problem at all getting a confirming score.

  • Patricia says:

    My child scored 1570 on the August SAT and then 1440 on the Oct 26 PSAT. Seems incongruent. Are you sensing any differences in scores reported between the PSAT dates this year, as occurred three years ago when the final October PSAT date had a steep scoring scale?

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Patricia,
      No, we are not seeing that sort of discrepancy nationally. The PSAT does have an inherent problem in measuring high scores, since even a perfect run is capped at 1520.

      It’s the SAT score that matters for college admission, of course, so there are many students who would gladly take that 1570. Great job!

  • Sarah says:

    I got a 224 index (1480, Math: 720, Reading/Writing: 760) in Massachusetts, is it likely I qualify for semifinalist? Thanks!

  • RP says:

    My son received a 216. We live in Pennsylvania. Do you believe his score is sufficient to advance him to the 2026 semifinals? Your ideas. Thank you!

  • Jessica says:

    My daughter got a perfect score, which is fantastic news, but I’m seeing plenty of other kids on Reddit getting perfect scores as well. My question is, if more than 50,000 kids get perfect scores, how will nmsqt choose semi-finalists?

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Jessica,
      That’s amazing! Reddit can be a wonderful source of information, but it’s not a good place to find an unbiased sample. Only about 1,000 students a year achieve a perfect score on the PSAT. Your daughter will be named a Semifinalist.

  • David says:

    Hello,
    I am slightly worried about my PSAT Score. I live in California, and got a 760 Math 740 EBRW (224 NMQST Score). Although I haven’t studied SAT in around a year (studied and got a 1580 in sophomore year, so was rusty as a junior), I didn’t expect it to cut it this close to the cutoff. Probably should have taken a couple of reading practice tests closer to the PSAT testing date.

    How likely do you believe that California’s cutoff will stay in the 220-223 range, and that I will qualify as a National Merit Semifinalist when September rolls around?

    • Art Sawyer says:

      David,
      I’m confident that California’s cutoff will stay in the 220-223 range. I am certain that it will not go above 224. Congratulations! And you’ve already got your confirming SAT score.

  • Johnny says:

    Hello,
    I just got my score and I had an index score of 220 in Texas, which caused me to become nervous when I saw your predicted range with a maximum of 221. I just want to understand why you predicted that Texas will have a cutoff of 220 instead of a 221 to hopefully ease my nerves, as the other high years with similar score range numbers from 2018-2020 had their cutoffs at 221s. Also, do you think I am likely to become a semi-finalist? And if you have some in mind, what would you say the odds are? Thank you.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      It looks like it’s a toss-up at this point. Will the final score release make things resemble the class of 2017 (220 cutoff) or 2018 (221)? It’s likely to fall somewhere between those two. Your chances of becoming a Semifinalist are around 50/50.

      • Johnny says:

        Thank you for your prompt response. Considering it’s equivalent to a coin flip, I have some final questions, as I am nervous. Based on what you have seen so far, are you leaning towards one or the other? Do you also have a range of how much the percentages of students between 1400-1520 will drop on the final wave? Thank you.

        • Art Sawyer says:

          Johnny,
          The arrangement of releasing scores in 3 batches is new, so I don’t have good information on what we’ll see in the final wave. If it’s really strong and we get closer to 70,000 high scorers, then 221 becomes a bit likelier. For now, I’m sticking with 220.

  • Catherine says:

    Hello, my daughter has a 1490 score for her PSAT test. She got 223 in Washington. Can she become a semi-finalist? Thanks.

  • Kiley says:

    I’m in Michigan and have a 219. I was excited thinking I would have it nearly for sure, based on past cutoffs. But then I read your explanation about higher numbers having higher scores and I wonder if it will be enough. You explained more scores are higher and that cutoffs would go up, but Michigan is estimated the same as last year. What do you think my chances are? Will it go up to 220 and make me miss it? Thank you for the great explanations of everything.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Kiley,
      I didn’t move Michigan up to 219, for now, because it has only hit 219 during the strongest of years, and we don’t yet know what the last set of scores will show. As for a 220 cutoff, that would be a new record for Michigan. For a large state such a Michigan, that’s not likely. I wish I could say that it was impossible, but I can’t. I think your chances are in the 90% range.

  • Trinity says:

    Hi Art, my son got 223, and we are in NJ. Do you think he is qualified to be a semifinalist if the cutoff stays at 223? Many thanks!!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Trinity,
      We’ve still never seen a cutoff at 224 (not counting the COVID-cancellation driven cutoff in Maryland in the class of 2022), and I don’t think that we will this year. But if there is a state that can do it, it will be New Jersey. I think there is a 95+% chance that a 223 qualifies.

  • YH says:

    Hello
    My daughter has index score of 224 in NJ. Any probability of NJ cutoff jumping to 225?
    Thank you for very informative article.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      YH,
      No chance. The scores thin out dramatically as you hit those top numbers. There simply aren’t enough 225-228 scorers to drive a cutoff above 224. Congratulations to your daughter!

  • sid says:

    So I got a 217 score index. I live in Michigan. What are the chances that the cutoff is 217 for the class of 2026? Thanks.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Sid,
      It may take a little bit of luck. I expect most cutoffs to be at least as high as the class of 2025 numbers. There will be exceptions, though, so we might see a 217 in Michigan. I’d put the chances at about 20-25%.

  • Sam says:

    Hello Sir,
    I have recently received my score as well and am wondering how sure your prediction of 219 is in Pennsylvania as I have received a 218 index. Sorry just a little nervous I guess.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Sam,
      One of the reasons I give a projected range is that “most likely’s” are rarely sure. States don’t move in unison. This does seem to be an “up” year, however, given the number of high scores nationally. I think we’ll see PA in the 218-220 range, but there is more likelihood that the cutoff goes up a point than down a point. I’m sorry to add to your nervousness. I’d put the odds at about one in four for a drop. In the class of 2021 we saw a 217, so let’s hope I’m wrong!

  • Sailor says:

    I got a 217 on this years PSAT in Florida. How likely am I to get semi Finalist? Thank you!

  • John P says:

    Hello,
    I got a 219 SI in Texas (740 Reading & Writing, 710 Math). Your range was between 218-221 for Texas, but you predicted most likely a 220 would be the SF cutoff. Why is it that you predict that you predict it will go up from 219 the past 3 years to 220?
    Thanks for your help.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      John,
      Keep in mind that I am just basing these predictions based on trends seen at the national level. Those trends trends typically flow through to the states, but not in a uniform way.

      Texas has been at 219 in recent years, but the number of students in the 1400-1520 range has also been lower than in some past years. In the classes of 2018-2020, for example, we saw high numbers of high scorers and high cutoffs to go along with them. Texas was at 221 in those years. I don’t think we’ll see numbers go that high this year — not as many students take the PSAT anymore — but there is enough pressure on scores that I think many cutoffs will rise. What we can hope for, of course, is that Texas is not among them!

  • Janie says:

    Hello! My son received his PSAT score last night (1470 with a 220 index). We live in Louisiana. Do you see any scenario where that wouldn’t qualify for Semifinalist? Thank you so much.

  • Lilou says:

    Hi! I got a 218 index in Arizona. I’m super excited! But waiting until September is a really long time. Will you put out new projection numbers when the final PSAT numbers come in on November 14th? And what do you think the odds are of a 218 making the cutoff for 2026 in Arizona? All your thoughts are greatly appreciated. Thank you!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Lilou,
      Yes, I’ll evaluate the estimates when I get more information. A 218 would have qualified in the last 5 class years. It’s the earlier ones that concern me a bit — AZ was at 219/220 in the classes of 2017 – 2020. I think it’s about 50/50.

  • Tina says:

    Do you have any state specific scores at this point? For example, how many kids received a score over 1400 in South Carolina?

  • Sunjeep says:

    Hi what are the odds do you think of qualifying for National Merit Semi finalist if I only got a 218 selection index in Pennsylvania

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Sunjeep,
      A drop in a large state like Pennsylvania is going to take a little luck this year (well, it’s not really luck; it depends on how many students tested in PA). Unfortunately, I’d say there is about an 80% chance that it will be at 219 or higher.

Leave a Reply

Share

Get Your Free Compass Guide to College Admissions