**Updated with information from released October 2026 PSAT scores as of November 6.**
If you’d like, jump right to the Compass Projections and State Explorer and then come back for the commentary.
The junior-year PSAT is also the National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (NMSQT). Each year, National Merit recognizes the top 55,000 test takers. To be included in that group, students must be among the top 4% of the 1.3 million eligible students who take the PSAT. Of that elite group, approximately 16,500 are recognized as Semifinalists for having the highest scores within their states. Semifinalists have the opportunity to continue in the program to become Finalists and, potentially, scholarship recipients. Some colleges provide significant scholarships and even full rides for Finalists. The remaining 39,000 students are recognized as Commended Students. More information can be found in our National Merit Explained post. If you are looking for Compass’s archived report on the class of 2027 results, find it here.
Calculating the Selection Index
National Merit uses the Selection Index (SI), found on the PSAT score report, to rank students. The Selection Index is calculated by doubling the Reading & Writing score (RW), adding the Math score (M), and dividing that sum by 10. For example, a student with a 720 RW score and a 700 M score has a Selection Index of 214: (720 x 2 + 700) ÷ 10. A student with a 700 RW and 720 M has a Selection Index of 212. The highest SI a student can receive is 228 (760 RW and 760 M). The weighting of the index means that not all students with the same Total Score have the same SI. “Will a 1450 qualify?” is not the right question. Instead, ask whether a student with a 750 RW and 700 M will qualify.
How Semifinalist cutoffs are set in each state
NMSC allocates a target number of Semifinalists to states based on their population of high school graduates, not all of whom take the PSAT. If Texas is allocated 1,500 Semifinalists based on its population of high school graduates, then NMSC works down from a perfect 228 Selection Index until it gets as close as possible to that target. In the class of 2027, 1,462 students scored at or above the cutoff of 219. A cutoff of 220 would have produced too few Semifinalists. A cutoff of 218 would have gone over the allocation. As scores go lower, more and more students occupy each level, and where the crowd forms does not stay consistent from year to year. It is easy for cutoffs to move up or down a point even when there is minimal change in testing behavior or performance. All students at or above a cutoff qualify.
Predicting scores for the class of 2028
The journey to National Merit is a long one. Semifinalists aren’t notified until September 2027, and Finalists might not hear until February 2028. Compass’s research aims to fill in some of the gaps during the long wait.
Approximately 80% of scores have been released by the first week in November. College Board only summarizes PSAT scores in broad ranges. The top range of 1400 to 1520 has proved to be an excellent indicator of the Commended cutoff and the overall trend in Semifinalist cutoffs.
Based on the scores released to date, Compass expects between 52,000 and 60,000 students to score in the top range, with 55,000 as the most likely figure. That’s only modestly above the 52,300 in the class of 2027, which is why Compass projects this year’s most likely Commended figure to be 209. Compass’s model assumes, based on prior years, that later scores will skew lower than earlier scores. However, we don’t yet know how many scores will be released in the final score release wave. We retain the possible Commended range of 207 – 211 to allow for uncertainty.
Comparing RW and Math scores also suggests moderation this year
Students considering their odds of qualifying as National Merit Semifinalists often look in horror at the class of 2026 cutoffs, which were among the highest recorded since the revised PSAT was introduced for the class of 2017. Compass has shown that those high cutoffs can likely be attributed to poor scaling of the RW section on the 2024 PSAT. Because RW receives double weight in the Selection Index, the scaling problem had an outsized impact on cutoffs, with New Jersey’s reaching 225. The good news is that this year’s results look more like those from the classes of 2025 and 2027 than they do those from the class of 2026. There are more high Math scores than RW scores (about a 1.33 to 1 ratio), which should keep the highest cutoffs in check. On average, Semifinalist cutoffs may see some upward movement, but there is no evidence of a spike.
Below is a chart of RW, Math, and Total scores over the 3 prior years, with estimates for the class of 2028. Final numbers should be available by November 13.
Did I make it?
A student’s natural instinct is to look at the prior year’s cutoff and ask, “Did I make it?” The historical record shows the shortcomings of that strategy. From the class of 2011 to the class of 2027, there has never been a year in which even half of the state cutoffs remained unchanged. Even with the added insight of national results, students should consider the likely range of cutoffs rather than focusing on a single score.
Semifinalist trends over time
In October 2015, the PSAT moved to a 320–1520 scale, which was set to provide vertical alignment with the SAT’s 400–1600 scale. The class of 2017 was the first group of students taking the redesigned PSAT/NMSQT, so the fairest comparisons are among the last eleven graduating classes.
Note how the Commended cutoff and state averages tend to track one another in the chart above. The chart below shows that there is more volatility in individual states, and more volatility in smaller states, but few states move against a rise or fall in the Commended level. We cannot assume, however, that the magnitude of the change will always be the same. We have an estimate of the Commended cutoff — a suspected 1-point increase — but won’t have confirmation until April.
Projections for the class of 2028: Consider the ranges.
In addition to our 50-state cutoff projections, Compass provides a deep dive into each state. Enter your own Selection Index or section scores to see how you stack up historically. The estimates consider state size, prior cutoffs and volatility, and Commended values.
As of 11/6/26, forecasted ranges combine historical data with early PSAT score information. The Commended cutoff will be confirmed in April.
Class of 2028 estimates by state
| State | Class of 2028 estimate | Past cutoffs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most likely | Estimated range | 2027 | 2026 | 2025 | |
| Alabama | 212 | 210–214 | 210 | 214 | 212 |
| Alaska | 211 | 209–214 | 208 | 215 | 214 |
| Arizona | 216 | 214–218 | 215 | 218 | 217 |
| Arkansas | 212 | 210–214 | 210 | 215 | 213 |
| California | 221 | 220–223 | 220 | 224 | 221 |
| Colorado | 217 | 216–219 | 217 | 219 | 218 |
| Connecticut | 221 | 219–222 | 220 | 223 | 221 |
| Delaware | 219 | 216–221 | 219 | 220 | 219 |
| District of Columbia | 223 | 222–224 | 223 | 225 | 223 |
| Florida | 217 | 215–218 | 216 | 219 | 217 |
| Georgia | 218 | 216–219 | 217 | 220 | 218 |
| Hawaii | 217 | 215–219 | 218 | 219 | 217 |
| Idaho | 213 | 210–215 | 211 | 215 | 213 |
| Illinois | 219 | 218–221 | 218 | 222 | 220 |
| Indiana | 216 | 214–218 | 215 | 218 | 217 |
| Iowa | 211 | 209–213 | 210 | 214 | 212 |
| Kansas | 214 | 212–216 | 212 | 216 | 215 |
| Kentucky | 212 | 210–214 | 211 | 214 | 213 |
| Louisiana | 213 | 211–215 | 211 | 216 | 214 |
| Maine | 214 | 212–217 | 214 | 217 | 214 |
| Maryland | 222 | 220–223 | 221 | 224 | 222 |
| Massachusetts | 222 | 221–224 | 221 | 225 | 223 |
| Michigan | 217 | 216–219 | 216 | 220 | 218 |
| Minnesota | 216 | 214–218 | 214 | 219 | 217 |
| Mississippi | 211 | 209–213 | 211 | 213 | 212 |
| Missouri | 215 | 213–217 | 214 | 217 | 215 |
| Montana | 209 | 208–212 | 208 | 213 | 209 |
| Nebraska | 212 | 210–214 | 212 | 214 | 211 |
| Nevada | 212 | 210–214 | 211 | 214 | 214 |
| New Hampshire | 216 | 214–218 | 215 | 219 | 217 |
| New Jersey | 223 | 222–224 | 223 | 225 | 223 |
| New Mexico | 209 | 208–211 | 209 | 210 | 211 |
| New York | 220 | 219–222 | 220 | 223 | 220 |
| North Carolina | 218 | 216–219 | 217 | 220 | 218 |
| North Dakota | 209 | 207–211 | 208 | 210 | 210 |
| Ohio | 217 | 215–218 | 216 | 219 | 217 |
| Oklahoma | 210 | 208–212 | 210 | 212 | 211 |
| Oregon | 217 | 215–219 | 216 | 219 | 216 |
| Pennsylvania | 219 | 217–220 | 219 | 221 | 219 |
| Rhode Island | 216 | 213–218 | 213 | 219 | 217 |
| South Carolina | 213 | 211–215 | 212 | 215 | 214 |
| South Dakota | 210 | 208–212 | 210 | 211 | 208 |
| Tennessee | 216 | 214–218 | 214 | 219 | 217 |
| Texas | 219 | 218–221 | 219 | 222 | 219 |
| Utah | 211 | 209–213 | 209 | 213 | 211 |
| Vermont | 213 | 210–216 | 212 | 216 | 215 |
| Virginia | 221 | 220–223 | 221 | 224 | 222 |
| Washington | 221 | 220–223 | 221 | 224 | 222 |
| West Virginia | 209 | 207–211 | 208 | 210 | 209 |
| Wisconsin | 213 | 211–215 | 212 | 215 | 214 |
| Wyoming | 209 | 207–211 | 208 | 210 | 209 |
| U.S. Students Abroad | 223 | 222–224 | 223 | 225 | 223 |
| U.S. Territories | 209 | 207–211 | 208 | 210 | 208 |
| Commended (national) | 209 | 207–211 | 208 | 210 | 208 |
Below are three of the most popular (and controversial) questions I get asked about the National Merit Scholarship Program. A couple of less controversial questions follow. Additional information can be found in our National Merit FAQ.
Why does each state have its own Semifinalist cutoff if the program is NATIONAL Merit?
This is always a hot-button question. NMSC allocates the approximately 16,500 Semifinalists among states based on the number of high school graduates. That way, students across the nation are represented. It also means that there are very different qualifying standards from state to state. A Massachusetts student with a 220 might miss out on being a Semifinalist. If she lived just 10 miles away in New Hampshire, she would qualify.
No Semifinalist cutoff can be lower than the national Commended level. Cutoffs for the District of Columbia and for U.S. students studying abroad are set at the highest state cutoff (typically New Jersey). The cutoff for students in U.S. territories and possessions falls at the Commended level each year. Boarding schools are grouped by region. The cutoff for a given region is the highest state cutoff within the region.
NMSC feels that the allocation method is the best way of ensuring truly national representation. That’s important, because without national representation, the program would likely not exist. National Merit requires participation from corporations and universities across the country. It constantly works to foster investment. Looking at the sponsors from 35 years ago, for example, shows just how much things change. The pitch to sponsors would be more difficult if Semifinalists were clustered in a smaller footprint. That doesn’t make the frustration any less real for the students who miss out.
When are National Merit Semifinalists announced? Why does it take so long?
The lists of Semifinalists will not be distributed to high schools until the end of August 2027. With the exception of homeschoolers, students do not receive direct notification. NMSC asks that schools not share the results publicly until the end of the press embargo in mid-September, but schools are allowed to notify students privately before that date. NMSC does not send Commended Student letters to high schools until mid-September. Compass will keep students updated on developments as the dates approach.
NMSC is an organization that values consistency — maybe sometimes to excess. The Semifinalist, Finalist, and Scholar cycle is little changed from what it was 60 years ago. Originally the NMSQT was in the spring of junior year, and email and the internet didn’t exist. Once the PSAT and NMSQT merged into a single exam, testing moved to the fall of junior year. The notification calendar never changed. During the winter and spring, NMSC is busy working with Finalist and Scholar selections. And counselors are busy getting seniors into college! In April and May, schools need to sign off on student eligibility. NMSC has always worked through schools for Semifinalist notifications, so September provides the next logical window. It’s slow and secretive, but it eventually works.
The schedule is hardest on students hoping to get one of the large scholarships offered by a limited number of universities. Key planning gets put on hold. I’d also like to see NMSC modernize its notification process. In the age of Bluebook, there is no excuse not to notify students directly and avoid the uncomfortable rollout of information. Colleges have long learned how to operate this way and build enthusiasm. The days of National Merit students being written up by the local newspaper are long gone, so why not let Instagram and TikTok take over?
Why is RW given twice the weight of Math?
There are many wrong answers to this question floating around the internet. It’s not because the PSAT had separate Reading and Writing sections during the SAT’s 2400 period. The weighting existed decades before that version of the exam. It’s not to favor one demographic over another. It dates back to the very creation of the test. In fact, the current method is more balanced than the original!
The National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (just the SQT in 1956 and 1957) was originally a separate test offered in the spring of junior year. The test was developed from the Iowa Testing Programs that also gave birth to the ACT. In fact, the NMSQT looked a lot like the original ACT. It had sections for English, Mathematics, Social Studies (Reading), Natural Sciences (Reading), and Vocabulary. Each section was scored 1-36, and the Selection Index was the sum of the five section scores. So 80% of the original Selection Index came from sections testing verbal skills. In 1971, NMSC merged the NMSQT with the College Entrance Examination Board’s PSAT, written by ETS. The PSAT and SAT only had Verbal and Mathematics scores (20-80 on the PSAT and 200-800 on the SAT). In order to keep a similar balance to the original NMSQT, the Verbal score was doubled to form the Selection Index.
The decision remains controversial, but its roots are 70 years old. As mentioned previously, NMSC likes continuity.
Do state and national percentiles indicate whether a student will be a National Merit Semifinalist?
No! Approximately 1% of test takers qualify as Semifinalists each year, so it is tempting to view a 99th percentile score as indicating a high enough score — especially now that College Board provides students with percentiles by state. There are several flaws in using percentiles as a quick way of determining National Merit status.
- Percentiles are based on section scores or total score, not Selection Index
- Percentiles are rounded. There is a large difference, from a National Merit perspective, between the top 0.51% and the top 1.49%
- Percentiles reveal the percentage of students at or below a certain score, but the “at” part is important when NMSC is determining cutoffs.
- The number of Semifinalists is based on the number of high school graduates in a state, not the number of PSAT takers. Percentiles are based on PSAT takers. States have widely varying participation rates.
- Most definitive of all: Percentiles do not reflect the current year’s scores! They are based on the prior 3 years’ performance. They are set even before the test is given. And if you are going to use prior history, why not use the record of prior National Merit cutoffs rather than the highly suspect percentiles?
When my score report says “Eligible for National Merit,” does that mean I qualify?
Eligibility means entering the program; qualifying comes later. Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.3 million students from the 1.4 million PSAT takers enter the competition each year. Only about 55,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.
Hello,
I live in Nevada, and my score was 214. It looks like I’m slightly unfavored to qualify, but you’d say it’s still realistic that I could, right?
Derek,
You’ve summarized things well. Historically, Nevada’s cutoff has been sensitive to changes in the Force, so to speak. During years where scores have been strong nationally, NV’s cutoff has gone as high as 218. It’s volatility ties it for second for the largest swings in the last decade, so it is a hard state to predict. I’d say that your chances are in the 35%-40% chance range.
Happy New Year, Art.
First of all, thank you for all your efforts for this article.
My Junior(Class of 2026) got an index of 222 in California, we’re hoping that it would be enough to qualify NMSF. We found that you changed your estimate cutoff to 222 from 221. Is there any reason that you changed the odd?
I am also wondering how much chance 222 can be qualified. I know that I should be patient until September but…it is so hard when we’re at the border line. Thank you!
EJ,
Once I confirmed that we were seeing a large number of high scores nationally, I moved a few states higher. In the case of California, it wasn’t because of any state-specific reason. I thought things were pretty equally weighted between 221 and 222, but I tipped toward the latter in the end. I think 223 is highly unlikely. Yes, we saw a 223 cutoff in the class of 2019, but the California landscape has changed dramatically since then. I’d say that there is a 90-95% chance of the CA cutoff being at 222 or lower. I’d argue that 220 is even more likely than 223.
Hi Art, Thank you for this, and Happy New Year! I’d like to know about my son’s chances of qualifying. He got a 219 index score in Florida. Thanks!
Shana,
A belated New Year! And congratulations to your son! I don’t see any chance that Florida would hit 220 this year.
Hey Art. Have you changed your projections for Florida? On the chart above it lists the possible range as 2016-2020. Thanks.
Mike,
Once I had a chance to review all of the scores, I did move up Florida’s range from 215-219 to 216-220. Realistically, it’s probably closer to 216-219.
Hello, is there any way for Maryland to drop to 220 for the class of 2026?
Bing,
Unfortunately, Maryland is always one of the top states and hasn’t gone as low as 220 in the time that I have tracked cutoffs. It’s not impossible, but I would have to call it highly unlikely. I hope that you are proud of an excellent score!
Hi Art,
Is it unlikely that Virginia’s cutoff score could reach 224 this year given its range of 220-223? My daughter is sitting at a 223.
Joy,
It’s highly unlikely. We still have not seen a true 224 cutoff in any state, in any year (Maryland’s was entirely a product of COVID cancellations). Virginia has topped out multiple times at 222, not even hitting 223 during the “up” years for the class of 2018 and 2019. I’d give a 223 a 99.5% chance of qualifying.
Happy New Year! I live in NC and I got a score of 218. What are the chances that the cutoff will be a 219 or above and do I have a strong chance of qualifying?
Angel,
I think a 218 cutoff in North Carolina is the most likely outcome. Based on historical performance, I’d put your odds at about 65-70%. Only 8 months until September, when we’ll know for sure.
Hi, I got a 222 in California. What are the chances that the cutoff jumps from a 221 to a 223?
Roy,
I think the days of California at 223 may be in the rearview. The state sees fewer PSAT takers these days, but the number of Semifinalists has not declined, because it is based on entire pool of high school students. Could it happen? Yes. But I think the chances are 5% or less.
Daughter had 216 in GA. Perfect score in math. Had the scores been reversed, she would have made SF easily. What chance that the cutoff will be as low as 216 in GA?
Mike,
Yes, the Selection Index formula is tough on math stars. Your daughter will likely be a Commended Student. Georgia’s cutoff has not dipped to 216 in the years that I have been following it. Unfortunately, nothing we have seen in the national scores indicate record lows for a large state like Georgia.
Hi Art,
Washington state Here. Thanks to the data in your website, I noticed that in the last 18 years, only 3 years has 222 as the NMSF cutoff. How likely the cutoff will jump to 223 for the NMSF cutoff for the class of 2026?
Thank you very much
Adelia,
It’s extremely unlikely. Washington has never hit 223 — only a few states ever have. As cutoffs get higher and higher, the chances of further increase decline. Unfortunately, I don’t think we can completely rule out the possibility. Nationally, this year does look stronger than last year. I’d put the chance of a 223 cutoff in the 5-10% range.
Hi Art, Happy New Year! I’d like to know about my Daughter’s chances of qualifying. She got a 222 index score in Pennsylvania. Thank you!
Thank you! Congratulations to your daughter, Tanisha! Her chances are 100%. I’m confident that we won’t see a 223 cutoff in PA.
Hi Art: I admit I am very bad with statistics, but why if you see “the highest ever percentage of top scores,” are you predicting that states like NY and PA do not go up from last year’s cutoff. Not doubting because I am sure there is something I just do not understand!
Naomi,
Fair question. If I boiled it down to 2 reasons, I’d say:
(1) NY and PA are both large states with stable scores. Because a cutoff is all-or-nothing, seeing more high scores nationally does not guarantee an increase in every state.
(2) This year has a lot of high scorers, but the counts are still off the heights we saw in the class of 2018-2020.
This is why I establish a range. In NY, I think the odds of a 221 are not far behind that of a 220, but I only allow myself one Most Likely. I feel just a bit more comfortable with my Pennsylvania Most Likely, because the state has only reached 220 twice.
Hey Art I got a 220 in missouri and think I have a good chance to get in I was wondering what the process is like for national merit. How/ when are you notified and things like that.
Jacob,
Congratulations! The next step will be competing to be a Finalist. You’ll need to have a “confirming” score on the SAT or ACT that meets the minimum national standard — generally the Commended cutoff, so it shouldn’t be that challenging for you. In September you’ll receive official notification via your school, and you will be given login information for the Online Scholarship Application portal (I think of it as the Finalist application). You’ll write an essay and fill out other background details. In order to qualify as a Finalist — and most Semifinalists do — you’ll need excellent grades and a recommendation from your school (which it will do as part of the OSA). So my only advice is to keep up your grades, do well on the SAT, and don’t make enemies with your principal. And try to hang tight until September.
Finalists are announced in January. NMSC then evaluates Finalists for scholarship awards. Some students will receive awards via college-sponsored scholarships. Others compete for the awards given directly by NMSC. The only thing under your control at that stage is what college you list as your first choice. Good luck!
Hi! I have a 222 in CA and was wondering — would you be able to comment more specifically on my chances for National Merit? I know 222 is listed as “most likely” but after reading some of the other replies on this thread, was hoping if you could give a more precise percentage like you did above! Hoping for the best in September 🙂
Melody,
When I give those “precise” percentages, please keep in mind that I’m using a very imprecise set of inputs — how a state has performed historically and my estimates of how much upward or downward pressure there is nationally (I don’t have any visibility into state-by-state performance for last October’s PSAT). With that in mind, I like your chances. First, California has only hit 223 once. Second, that was in a year that saw even more high scores than this year. Third, California test taker numbers have declined in recent years. Forth (and related to third), California’s cutoff would need to jump 2 points. So I’d put your chances at 90-95%. Good luck!
https://www.canadianrecord.com/school-news/chs-senior-laney-hood-national-merit-scholar-finalist
This question is more of a historical curiosity, but I recently ran across the following article, which gives a complete history of National Merit honorees at a small rural high school in Texas.
Since the beginning of the National Merit program, it shows there having been four finalists. However, it has another 10 semifinalists who did not advance to Finalist, all at least half a century ago. Since the overwhelming majority of Semifinalists advance to Finalist, this is odd, and I was wondering if you have any insight as to what’s going on. I can think of several hypotheses:
1. What we now call “Semifinalist” used to be called “Finalist”, with “Semifinalist” being a lower level of recognition (this is undercut by there being commended students listed from that era).
2. A much smaller portion of semifinalists used to advance to finalist.
3. There was some part of the Finalist application back in the day that students from this town systematically weren’t doing.
4. The information in the article is erroneous.
George,
Well, I have to say that this is one of the more intriguing questions that I’ve received. There is the direct mystery that you raise, but also the intriguing issue of why a small town newspaper has such an extensive list of National Merit honorees. And, I suppose, there is the intrigue of how you — and now I — ended up going down this rabbit hole.
We can eliminate (2). In the late 1950s, news sources cited approximately 7,500 Semi-Finalists (the hyphen got dropped at some point) and 7,000 Finalists. This agrees with NMSC’s press materials in the 1960s that cite 95% (I’ve found that NMSC always rounds their figures, so best not to take them too literally). Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, they seemed to have switched to claiming 90%. In recent decades, the numbers have settled to where they are today, with about 16,000+ Semifinalists and 15,000 Finalists.
(3) is a possibility, especially because the PSAT/NMSQT did not come into existence until 1971 (class of 1973). So all of those early honorees took the test given by National Merit. The subsequent steps, though, are comparable to today: students had to take the Scholastic Aptitude Test, have academic success, and be recommended by their schools. In the first few years of National Merit in the mid-1950s, things were a bit different. Students were nominated by their principals and then took a qualifying exam. But by the late 1950s the qualifying exam had been opened more widely to hundreds of thousands of students. One possibility is that the students of Canadian just didn’t bother with the S.A.T. (the periods are time appropriate). Or, as you say, the school might not have advanced students’ applications during some periods.
(1) is not true unless we view it in the context of (4). One theory is that the Record has confused Finalist for Scholar. The number of scholarships has varied over the years, but it has usually been in the 30-50% range for Finalists. Given the modest numbers that we are dealing with, that might explain the discrepancy. It’s entirely possible, of course, that the modest numbers explain things entirely — we are not exactly analyzing a pool of thousands of students.
I’m inclined to give the Record some benefit of the doubt, though, given how particular it has been with its information. If I knew that the mystery were solvable with a subscription to the archive, I’d be tempted to go for it! What I also find interesting (as a coincidence or not) is that the Bezell brothers (1961 and 1971) are the sons of longtime Canadian Record owner and publisher Ben Bezell. And their sister has been the publisher for several decades now.
There is also the issue of large gaps in time. The town had a healthy supply of honorees in the early years, but things were lean in the 1970s, very lean in the 1980s, saw a 3-year surge in 1991-1993, and then a 15-year drought. This may be reading too much into small numbers. I also have to imagine that a small town in the Texas Panhandle has seen its share of booms and busts and changes in student profiles over 60 years. Then we have the ever-changing number of NMSQT takers, PSAT/NMSQT takers, Texas students, SAT takers, etc..
I don’t have a definitive answer, but it seems like the pre-PSAT honors may be an anomaly. If we take only PSAT/NMSQT qualifiers, then 3 out of 4 Semifinalists became Finalists, and 9 students were Commended, which also provides a believable ratio.
Thank you for forcing me to brush up on my early National Merit knowledge. If you ask me what the cutoffs were in Texas in the 1960s, though, I may ghost you.
Thank you so much for the valuable information and work. Is a perfect PSAT score a done deal for recognition or not? Florida state here. Thanks
Prya,
Congratulations! It is a done deal for Semifinalist recognition. At the next stage, you (or your student) are equal to all other Semifinalists. Finalist selection will be based on satisfying NMSC’s requirements on academic performance, SAT/ACT score, recommendation, and application. You’ll get more information with your qualifying letter in September!
Hi Art,
Thanks so much for the info. I got a 224 and I go to an overseas Department of Defense school, and I was wondering whether this puts me under US Territory or studying abroad as far as jurisdiction. And if it’s the latter, is there any chance at all the cutoff score reaches a 225 or above?
thx so much!
Jianne,
I haven’t been able to pin down an answer. My guess is that you would fall in Studying Abroad unless, of course, you are located in a U.S. Territory or Commonwealth. The good news is that you will be a National Merit Semifinalist no matter where you live. I continue to maintain that we will not see a 225 cutoff on the current version of the PSAT. Congratulations!
Hi Art,
I have a question on college choice. I am a 2025 semifinalist and hope to become a finalist when they announce it next week.
I was initially accepted to UT-Dallas in Comp. Sci and put that on my college choice. I could get their full-ride NMS package. But then on Friday I was accepted to UT-Austin in Comp. Sci. program. My question is can I change my college choice to UT-Austin now? I know they do not participate in NMS but can I at least compete for the NMS award for the $2.5K?
Also, can you tell me what criteria is used to select the $2.5K NMS winners?
Thanks!
Vishal,
Congratulations on your acceptances. Students are normally able to switch until well into the spring, although I don’t recommend waiting too long or it can cause a mismatch. AFAIK, the initial matches don’t happen until March, so you should be fine. Yes, you would then be in competition for one of the NMS awards. Finalists are a highly qualified group, and only about one-sixth of Finalists get a direct award for NMSC. The odds are not quite as long once you factor out college and corporate-sponsored scholarships, but still about 1 in 4. It sounds as if you are making your decision based on where you most want to go to school — and that’s great! If UT-Austin is the school for you and you’ll only consider the $2,500 scholarship, then you should adjust your first choice school. The folks at NMSC are quite nice, so you can also give them a call to discuss.
Thanks for the response Art! Appreciate it.
I do want to go to UT-Austin based on the quality and ranking of the CS program and closeness to my home. I went ahead and changed my school choice now. I hope I am lucky enough to get that $2500 but not counting on it.
Good luck!
Any chance that Oklahoma will lower to a 209? Is there any option to show high SAT/ACT scores to qualify or is the NMPSAT the only path for this?
CG,
Let me take the easier part first. No, once a student has taken the PSAT, there is no option to substitute an SAT score. There is an alternate entry path using SAT scores available to students who were not able to take the PSAT. You (or your student) don’t fall in that category.
It’s unlikely, but possible. Oklahoma’s cutoff has always come in 1-5 points above the Commended cutoff (no NMSF cutoff can be lower than the Commended). I think that the lowest the Commended will go this year will be 209. So there are two ways that Oklahoma hits 209. (1) I’m wrong, the Commended cutoff is 207 or 208, and Oklahoma is just barely over that figure. (2) The Commended cutoff comes in at the low end of my expected range (209), and Oklahoma breaks out of its historical pattern and sees a Semifinalist cutoff exactly at the Commended level. I think both of those are low probability, but the combination of those possibilities is why I did consider 209 within my estimated range for OKlahoma. I’d say that it is a lower than a 5% probability.
Hi Art,
What are the chances in your opinion that Michigan will get up to 220 as the cut off this year? I got a 219. I’m really hoping to make it to a Semi-Finalist position.
Anj,
Michigan has never crested 219, so your chances are pretty good. That said, I would not be surprised to see several states hit new highs this year. I’d say 5-10% chance of Michigan’s cutoff going to 220.
Hello Art,
Regarding the Oklahoma question. What is percentage chance of a selection index of 211 qualifying? I realize you have 212 projected.
O.K.,
It’s so tricky to set chances in OK because of how volatile cutoffs have been — especially in “up” years. I’d say that there is a 30-40% chance that the cutoff will stay the same (211) or decline.
Hello Art, IL resident here. My student received a 220, but your score goes as high as possibly 222. With scores being up high this year, what are the chances a 220 makes the cutoff in IL? Thank you!
Elle,
Illinois’ cutoff has been at 221 in 3 of the 9 years that I typically look at (the class of 2017 was the start of the revised SAT). Unfortunately, this year looks a bit more like those years than it does the other 6. Still, I give the edge to a 220 at maybe 60% likelihood.
Hi Mr. Sawyer!
Thank you for your data on the semifinalist cutoffs. Very interesting to look at, especially in terms of historical changes and the data by state. Anyways, I took the PSAT back in October 2024 in Michigan and I recieved a 221 Index Score. I know you have estimated Michigan’s cutoff to be from 216-220, but is there any chance at all of it making it to 221 or above? I guess I just want a more qualified opinion on my chances of making it to Semifinalist standing than my own! One other thing I was wondering about too. If my score does eventually qualify me for the competition to be a Finalist, I know I have to earn a “confirming” SAT score as a part of the application and qualification process. Do you have any benchmark SAT scores/score goals to make sure that my SAT score is a “confirming” one? I’ve been doing prep for my upcoming April SAT, and this thought has been going through my mind while I’m studying. Once again, thank you for all the statistics and information about this! It has honestly been super helpful and helped me understand the whole NMSQT process more!
(Sorry for the super long comment! :))
Congratulations, Meaghan! Will Michigan jump 2-3 points higher than it has ever hit before? No. It won’t even get to 221, let alone higher than that. You will be a Semifinalist.
The confirming score is set nationally, and is generally the SAT equivalent of the Commended Score. We don’t know that score yet, but you should be safe with an SAT Selection Index above 212. NMSC does not superscore, but it will consider your best test date.
Hi,
What are the chances in your opinion that Virginia will get to 221 as the cut off this year? I got a 221. I’m really hoping to make it to a Semi-Finalist position.
MK,
Last year’s 222 was something of a surprise given how moderate scores were nationwide. Because we are seeing upward pressure on scores this year, I still think that it is more likely than not that the cutoff will stay at 222. I’d estimate a 40% chance of a 221. You may want to keep an eye on the Commended cutoff (usually leaks in late April) for more information about how much an “up” year we are really seeing.
Hi Art, thank you for your information. I can see from your prediction for Washington Class of 2026, estimated range is 220 to 223, and most likeky is 221. Considering Washington actual 2025 cutoff is 222, do you think my daughter with 221 index will get a chance for semifinalist? Thanks.
Julia,
It would be so much better for all of us if scores never fluctuated! I look at the full history for a state, but usually my attention gravitates to the classes of 2017 – 2020, because those were the years that I think best reflect what we are seeing nationwide for the class of 2026 (although I think things are less extreme than 2019/2020). Those 4 classes saw a 220, a 221, and two 222s. So you can see why I’m torn between a “most likely” of 221 and 222. A 222 might be more likely than a 221, but a 220 is more likely than a 223. So I’d say about a 50% chance that a 221 will be sufficient.
Any chance of GA score being greater than 219?
Thanks!
Usha,
Yes, I do think there is a chance. While I peg 219 as the “most likely” cutoff, I think there is a 30% chance it will go higher. Good luck!